Care & Compatibility

Purpose of This Section

This document outlines general care principles and compatibility considerations for jewelry components. It is intended to help makers understand how materials and components interact over time and under use, rather than to provide product-specific instructions.

These guidelines apply across the ONESIKA component system unless otherwise specified.


Material Care Principles

All jewelry materials are subject to wear over time. Proper care helps maintain appearance and functional integrity but cannot prevent natural aging.

General Considerations

  • Avoid prolonged exposure to moisture, chemicals, and cosmetics

  • Remove jewelry before activities involving friction or impact

  • Store components in a dry, separated environment

Care practices should be aligned with material type and intended use, not appearance alone.


Gold Plated Components

Gold plated components rely on a surface gold layer for appearance.

  • Excessive friction may accelerate surface wear

  • Contact with chemicals can affect plating longevity

  • Best suited for light to moderate use

Gold plated components are designed for controlled wear conditions.


Gold Filled Components

Gold filled materials feature a thicker gold layer mechanically bonded to a base metal.

  • More resistant to abrasion than gold plated materials

  • Suitable for repeated or long-term use

  • Still subject to wear under extreme conditions

Gold filled components balance durability and practicality.


Vermeil Components

Vermeil combines a sterling silver base with a gold surface layer.

  • Silver base may react to environmental conditions

  • Gold layer durability depends on thickness and care

  • Suitable for moderate to frequent wear

Care should consider both the silver base and the gold surface.


Component Compatibility

Compatibility refers to how components function together structurally, not merely whether they fit visually.

Structural Compatibility

Key factors include:

  • Wire thickness (GA / mm)

  • Inside diameter and opening size

  • Load-bearing expectations

Components should be selected so that no single element becomes a structural weak point.


Jump Rings and Clasps

When pairing jump rings with clasps:

  • Wire thickness should be proportionally matched

  • Jump rings should not deform under clasp load

  • Closed or heavier jump rings may be required for higher stress positions

Structural compatibility is more important than visual consistency.


Mixed Materials

Combining different base metals is common in jewelry making.

Considerations include:

  • Different hardness levels

  • Potential wear at contact points

  • Varying aging characteristics

Material mixing should be evaluated based on function and contact, not material category alone.


Wear and Aging Expectations

All jewelry components age over time.

  • Surface finishes may soften or fade

  • Mechanical components may loosen with repeated use

  • Structural stress accumulates gradually

Aging is not a defect but a natural outcome of use.

Design choices should account for expected lifespan and usage patterns.


Compatibility Within the ONESIKA System

Within the ONESIKA product system, compatibility is defined by functional categories and shared standards.


System-Based Compatibility

  • Components within the same functional category are designed to work together predictably

  • Size, wire thickness, and material standards are aligned across compatible parts

  • Structural balance is prioritized over visual matching

This system approach reduces uncertainty when assembling multi-component designs.


System Notes

  • Compatibility is evaluated at the system level, not per SKU

  • Material and size standards are documented separately

  • Product pages reference these standards rather than redefining them

This documentation defines general compatibility logic, while specific products represent implementations of that logic.


Notes

  • Care practices reduce risk but do not eliminate wear

  • Compatibility should be evaluated structurally, not visually

  • Standards provide guidance, not absolute guarantees

Last updated